Search Result

The proliferation of counterfeit and substandard medicines constitutes a major public health crisis in low- and middle-income countries, with The Gambia exemplifying regulatory fragility. This article contends that trademark infringement, often treated as a commercial issue, is a structural determinant of health, generating pathogenic legal exposures that intensify disease burden and inequity. A convergent mixed-methods design, grounded in legal epidemiology and health systems analysis, underpins the study. Quantitatively, it examines national data (2013–2023) on customs seizures, adverse drug reactions, and health facility records. Qualitatively, it integrates 32 semi-structured interviews with regulators, healthcare providers, and legal experts, alongside analysis of national and international policy frameworks. A literature synthesis situates The Gambia within the global counterfeit medicines burden, underscoring West Africa’s vulnerability due to porous borders, fragmented institutions, and the limited utility of mobile authentication in resource-constrained settings. Findings reveal profound systemic weaknesses: legal ambiguities, overlapping mandates, chronic underfunding of enforcement agencies, and limited public access to verified pharmaceutical data. Thematic analysis highlights policy incoherence and accountability gaps, while regression modelling demonstrates a significant link between weak trademark enforcement and counterfeit drug proliferation. The 2022 acute kidney injury outbreak from contaminated syrups illustrates these failures. The study concludes that combatting counterfeit medicines requires reframing trademark protection as a public health imperative. It recommends integrated legal-regulatory reform, multisectoral governance, capacity-building for enforcement bodies, and consumer empowerment through accessible verification tools. Embedding legal determinants into pharmaceutical policy offers a novel pathway to strengthening health security and restoring public trust in The Gambia and comparable contexts.

The present study titled “A Comparative Study of Agility and Flexibility between Government and Private School Students of Kashmir” was conducted to measure and compare agility and flexibility of the students studying in government and private schools of Kashmir. The study used comparative cross sectional research design. The study included a total of 100 students, with 50 students from government schools and 50 students from private schools. Agility was assessed by the Illinois Agility Test and flexibility by the Sit-and-Reach Test. Descriptive statistics including Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) were used to analyze the collected data. Independent-Samples t-test was used to determine significant differences between the two groups at the 0.05 level of significance. The results indicated significant difference between the students of government schools and private schools for both the selected variables of physical fitness. Private school students were more agile as evidenced by a lower mean time (18.51 ± 1.28 seconds) compared to government school students (19.24 ± 1.36 seconds) which was statistically significant (t = 2.77, p = 0.007). Also, the private school students had a mean flexibility score of 24.06 ± 3.58 cm which was significantly higher than the government school students (21.68 ± 3.42 cm) with a statistically significant difference (t = 3.40, p = 0.001). Among the selected participants of the study, it is concluded that the private school students showed better agility and flexibility than the government school students. However, the observed differences are unlikely to be due solely to school type as physical fitness may also be affected by physical activity, sports participation, exercise habits and other individual and environmental factors. The findings highlight the need to strengthen regular physical education, sports participation and fitness-oriented activities among school going students in Kashmir.